Dr. Martin Neumann

TISSS Lab Spring School: "Artificial Intelligence, Simulation and Society"

Instructors: Prof. Dr. Petra Ahrweiler; Blanca Luque Capellas; Martin Neumann
Shortname: S Techniksoziologie
Course No.: 02.149.16911
Course Type: Seminar

Requirements / organisational issues

Zielgruppe:

  1. Bachelor Studierende im Studiengang Soziologie (Kern- und Beifach) [po 2011, 2016]
  2. Bachelor Studierende im Studiengang Wirtschaftspädagogik (Schwerpunktfach "Sozialwissenschaften")
  3. Master Studierende im Studiengang Humangeographie im Kontextfach „Soziologie“
  4. Master Studierende im Studiengang Sportwissenschaft

Stellung im Studiengang:

  1. B.A. Soziologie Kernfach: Modul "Gegenstandsbezogene Soziologien (Orientierung A)" [po 2011]
  2. B.A. Soziologie Kernfach: Modul "Gegenstandsbezogene Soziologien (Orientierung B)" [po 2011]
  3. B.A. Soziologie Beifach: Modul "Gegenstandsbezogene Soziologien (Orientierung A)" [po 2011]
  4. B.A. Soziologie Beifach: Modul "Gegenstandsbezogene Soziologien (Orientierung B)" [po 2011]
  5. B.A. Soziologie Kernfach: Modul "Gegenstandsbezogene Soziologien (Orientierung)" [po 2016]
  6. B.A. Soziologie Beifach: Modul "Gegenstandsbezogene Soziologien (Orientierung)" [po 2016]
  7. B.Sc. Wirtschaftspädagogik Schwerpunktfach "Sozialwissenschaften": Modul "Aufbaumodul Soziologie"
  8. M.Sc. Humangeographie: Modul „Kontextfach Soziologie“
  9. M.Sc. Sportwissenschaft: Modul 9 „Schlüsselqualifikationen“

This course is open to exchange students (of all subjects). To register, please contact the Sociology Office (studienbuero.soziologie@uni-mainz.de).  

Anwesenheitspflicht

Anyone who is absent in the first session without excuse gives up their place. A prior informal excuse to the teacher by e-mail is sufficient. No medical certificate is required.

Recommended reading list

The following literature is expected to be read before the corresponding session (please find the links/pdf files uploaded in Moodle):

Monday 7th April:
Angwin, J., Larson, J., Mattu, S. and L. Kirchner (2016): Machine Bias. ProPublica https://www.propublica.org/article/machine-bias-risk-assessments-in-criminal-sentencing
Fourcade, M. (2016). Ordinalization: Lewis A. Coser Memorial Award for Theoretical Agenda Setting 2014. Sociological Theory, 34(3), 175-195. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275116665876

Tuesday 8th April:
Ahrweiler, P., Spaeth, E., Siqueiros Garcia, J.M., Luque Capellas, B. and D. Wurster (2025): Inclusive technology co-design for participatory Al. In: Participatory Artificial Intelligence in Public Social Services. From Bias to Fairness in Assessing Beneficiaries. Springer: Cham.
Ahrweiler, P., Abe, J. and M. Neumann (2025): Using a case study approach for investigating the status quo and future options of Al-based social assessment in public service provision. In: Participatory Artificial Intelligence in Public Social Services. From Bias to Fairness in Assessing Beneficiaries. Springer: Cham.
Sabater Coll, A., López, B., Campdepadrós, R., Sánchez, C. (2025). Participatory Action Research for AI in Social Services: An Example of Local Practice in Spain. In Ahrweiler, P. (ed), Participatory Artificial Intelligence in Public Social Services. Cham: Springer.
Späth, E. (2025). The AI use in the asylum procedure in Germany: exploring perspectives with refugees and supporters on assessment criteria and beyond. In Ahrweiler, P. (ed), Participatory Artificial Intelligence in Public Social Services. Cham: Springer.

Wednesday 9th April:
Squazzoni, F., Jager, W., & Edmonds, B. (2014). Social Simulation in the Social Sciences: A Brief Overview. Social Science Computer Review, 32(3), 279-294. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439313512975
Ahrweiler, P., Gilbert, N., Bicket, M., Sabater Coll, A., Luque Capellas, B., Wurster, D., Siqueiros, J. and E. Späth (2024): Gamification and Simulation for Innovation. In: Elsenbroich, C. and H. Verhagen (eds) Advances in Social Simulation. Springer Proceedings in Complexity. Springer, Cham: 121-136.
Cowls, J., Tsamados, A., Taddeo, M. and Floridi, L. (2023): The AI gambit: leveraging artificial intelligence to combat climate change—opportunities, challenges, and recommendations. AI & Soc 38: 283–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01294-x
 Galaz, V., Centeno, M. A., Callahan, P. W., Causevic, A., Patterson, T., Brass, I., Baum, S., Farber, D., Fischer, J., Garcia, D., McPhearson, T., Jimenez, D., King, B., Larcey, P., & Levy, K. (2021). Artificial intelligence, systemic risks, and sustainability. Technology in Society, 67, 101741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101741

Contents

Overview:
The Spring School explores the triad of „AI, Simulation, Society“ for two highly relevant and highly sensitive Innovation Areas: (1) AI use in assessing potential beneficiaries for public social services, and (2) AI use to mitigate climate crisis risks in natural disaster response. In both areas, the course deals with sociological aspects of AI futures and our ability to shape, test, and prototype potential techno-futures by sociological methods such as serious games in participatory social research and social simulation.

Innovation Area 1: AI use in assessing beneficiaries for public social service provision
AI technologies are increasingly applied in assessing people as beneficiaries. However, the use of
AI is challenged for its fairness: Existing biases and discrimination in service provision appear to be
perpetuated as result of machine learning on past data. Fairness, however, is a cultural concept: its
meaning in terms of values and beliefs, its implications for technology design, and the desired
techno-futures need to be societally negotiated.

The School will start with a series of contents-related sessions with lectures on 

  1. introducing the challenge to provide participatory AI responsive to societal needs
  2. reviewing existing systems
  3. anticipating and projecting future systems

This will be followed by methods-related sessions where participants will learn how specific formats can help to bring sociological aspects to AI development. They learn, partly by lectures but also by direct experience, how

  1. gamification, i.e., applying game elements in non-game contexts, can act as a low-threshold entry point for people to contribute to research
  2. games can be designed to explore how people would create better systems from their perspective
  3. the gamification approach can empower participants to deal with the problem of distributing scarce resources in the discussion and negotiation context of their specific socio-cultural setting
  4. gamified solutions can work as input for simulations of the desired system leading to further discussions and deliberations
  5. simulations can use agent-based modelling to reflect the gamified social context as a second-order construction of participants
  6. they can observe the outcome of their design decisions in the simulation and use this for further iterations between game and simulation improving outcomes. 

Innovation Area 2: AI use to mitigate climate crisis risks in natural disaster response
AI already increases our resilience and our capacity dealing with a broad range of ecological crisis issues; there are many AI applications in natural disaster management with focus on flood, heat, fire, draught, etc., e.g. forecasting extreme weather events and disaster prediction, sensor networks and automated decision systems. However, full use of deep computation for smart solutions to keep up with accelerated crisis scenarios is not yet implemented. AI is accused of a gap between technology and society: For broad uptake and unfolding its expected transformation potential, AI would need to be more responsive to societal needs, more ethical, responsible and participatory.

In this part of the Spring School, participants will apply their learnings in small working groups and develop own contributions analogous to the workflow and methods of Innovation Area 1. Supported by the instructors, they will develop contents-related presentations

  1. introducing the challenge to provide participatory AI responsive to societal needs 
  2. reviewing existing systems
  3. anticipating and projecting future systems

followed by methods-related contributions such as serious games and ideas for simulation.

Learning outcomes:
By the end of the course participants will:

  1. Understand the sociological aspects of AI use in complex social systems
  2. Understand the concept of participation and its relation to inclusive technology co-design
  3. Know and understand the substantive problems, theories and models in the two innovation areas (AI use for assessing beneficiaries for public social services; AI use to mitigate climate crisis risks in natural disaster response)
  4. Understand mixed-methods approaches in the social sciences
  5. Understand the use of serious games and simulation in sociology
  6. Be able to conceptualise a serious game
  7. Be able to apply a set of good practices for developing a simulation model
  8. Be able to reflect upon the strength and pitfalls of gamification and social simulation

Course requirements: 

  1. Studying in a social science discipline or related disciplines desirable
  2. Some prior reading of course literature required
  3. No prior programming experience required

Assignments:
The assignments of this Spring School consist of three group-work contributions: (i) a presentation on a topic of Innovation Area 2 to be identified and discussed in the course; (ii) a serious game design to engage in co-design activities for Innovation Area 2; (iii) and an ABM flowchart sketching the idea for a simulation model in Innovation Area 2. All assignments will be developed during the sessions. Results will be presented and delivered on the last day of the Spring School.

Additional information

In modules 09 and 10 (core subject) and module 06 (minor subject) , one “Vertiefungsseminar“ and one “Wahlveranstaltung“ must be taken.

A term exam/paper must be written in one of the seminars per module. The topic of the term paper/exam must be discussed in advance with the supervisor. Assignments whose topic has not been discussed in advance may be rejected. This does not replace registration for the examination in Jogustine.

Further information (in German) on those courses (“Vertiefungsseminare” and “Wahlveranstaltungen“) can be found here: https://www.soziologie.uni-mainz.de/studienverlauf-und-modulhandbuecher/

Further information on writing a term paper can be found here: https://www.soziologie.uni-mainz.de/files/2020/08/Handreichung-zur-Anfertigung-von-Hausarbeiten.pdf

This course is open to exchange students (of all subjects). To register, please contact the Sociology Office (studienbuero.soziologie@uni-mainz.de). 


The exact Spring School dates: 
Monday: 14:00 - 17:00 
Tuesday: 10:00 - 13:00 and 15:00 - 17:00 
Wednesday: 10:00 - 13:00 and 15:00 - 17:00 
Thursday: 10:00 - 13:00 and 15:00 - 17:00 
Friday: 10:00 - 13:00 

Dates

Date (Day of the week) Time Location
04/07/2025 (Monday) 14:00 - 17:00 01 501 Seminarraum;01 511 Seminarraum
1137 - Georg-Forster-Gebäude (Sowi)
04/07/2025 (Monday) 14:00 - 17:00 01 501 Seminarraum;01 511 Seminarraum
1137 - Georg-Forster-Gebäude (Sowi)
04/08/2025 (Tuesday) 10:00 - 17:00 01 511 Seminarraum
1137 - Georg-Forster-Gebäude (Sowi)
04/08/2025 (Tuesday) 12:00 - 17:00 01 721 Seminarraum
1137 - Georg-Forster-Gebäude (Sowi)
04/09/2025 (Wednesday) 10:00 - 17:00 01 501 Seminarraum;01 511 Seminarraum
1137 - Georg-Forster-Gebäude (Sowi)
04/09/2025 (Wednesday) 10:00 - 17:00 01 501 Seminarraum;01 511 Seminarraum
1137 - Georg-Forster-Gebäude (Sowi)
04/10/2025 (Thursday) 10:00 - 17:00 01 511 Seminarraum;01 701 Seminarraum
1137 - Georg-Forster-Gebäude (Sowi)
04/10/2025 (Thursday) 10:00 - 17:00 01 511 Seminarraum;01 701 Seminarraum
1137 - Georg-Forster-Gebäude (Sowi)
04/11/2025 (Friday) 10:00 - 13:00 01 501 Seminarraum;01 511 Seminarraum
1137 - Georg-Forster-Gebäude (Sowi)
04/11/2025 (Friday) 10:00 - 13:00 01 501 Seminarraum;01 511 Seminarraum
1137 - Georg-Forster-Gebäude (Sowi)